Thursday, November 15, 2012

3.3 AILD Critical Essay Breakdown


            “Her sudden and brief affair with Whitfield constitutes Addie’s attempt to explore this new relationship between words and acts, for it encompasses even as it differentiates between two quite distinct conceptions of sin. As a word, sin is the opposite of virtue and leads inevitably to damnation. It is this aspect, which Addie stresses when she thinks of sin as garments which she and Whitfield wear in the face of the world and which they remove ‘in order to shape and coerce the terrible blood to the forlorn echo of the dead word high in the air.’ (101) But as an act sin may be a step toward salvation… The adultery thus becomes a moral act, not, of course, in the sense of ‘good’ or ‘virtuous’ but in the sense that it reestablishes the reality of moral conduct and of the relationship between God and man. This reality is neither linguistic nor factual in character; instead, it consists of the possible, the hypothetical, the conceivable, all, in short, that follows from the capacity for unrestricted choice. Significantly, Addie sees in Jewel, the child of her sin, a sign of grace: ‘He is my cross and he will be my salvation. He will save me from the water and from the fire.’ (97) Through sin Addie seeks to find and enact her own humanity, and if her solution seems extreme, so is her provocation. (239)
            “The Interplay of seriousness which reaches toward tragedy and of humor which is practically farce is part of the complete success of As I Lay Dying. In a sense, it reinforces the theme of the separation of words and acts by insisting on at least these two modes of response to the same set of characters and events. At the same time, it precludes any easy generalizations about the funeral journey itself. Any event or series of events elicits various and, at times, contradictory responses. The meaning of an experience as distinct from a word exists in the consciousness of the individual observer. Accordingly, it is only when one becomes conscious of the mingling humor and pathos, of the relation of the Bundrens to Addie, and of the observers to the action that the full complexity of As I Lay Dying is plumbed and Faulkner’s easy mastery of it recognized.” (248) Formalism
            Catherine Belsey would claim that formalist critics limit themselves by deriving all meaning in their critique from the text being read and not allowing themselves the freedom to expand upon their interpretations using outside sources including other critical analysis, historical references, intertextual comparisons, and ideological interpretations. The result of formalism does however present the reader of the analysis with insight into the opinions and perspectives of the critic.

            “Words don’t ever fit even what they are trying to say at. When he was born I knew that motherhood was invented by someone who had to have a word for it because the ones that had the children didn’t care whether there was a word for it or not.” (99)
            “[Anse] had a word, too. Love, he called it. But I had been used to words for a long time. I knew that that word was like the others: just a shape to fill a lack; that when the right time came, you wouldn’t need a word for that anymore than for pride or fear. Cash did not need to say it to me nor I to him, and I would say, ‘Let Anse use it, if he wants to.’ So that it was Anse or love; love or Anse: it didn’t matter.” (99)
            These passages reflect the formalist perspective that meaning of a text be derived only from the words presented by the text. These passages can also be interpreted as structuralist because they suppose that the meaning of words is derived historically.
           
            The limitation of formalism is that all meaning is derived from within the single text in question. It is essentially a critic’s way of doing their own rereading of the text without reflecting on any outside sources or opinions. This limitation is also the source of formalisms importance to literary criticism because every critic has their own life experiences that have shaped their perspective and therefore critics will “see” different things in a work of literature.

No comments:

Post a Comment